View Single Post
Old 09-13-2012, 11:21 AM   #254
foghat
Evangelist
foghat ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.foghat ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.foghat ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.foghat ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.foghat ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.foghat ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.foghat ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.foghat ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.foghat ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.foghat ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.foghat ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.
 
Posts: 464
Karma: 1006520
Join Date: Mar 2010
Location: Alberta, Canada
Device: Kindle PW3
Quote:
Originally Posted by Graham View Post
So are you saying that Apple shouldn't be suing Samsung for building on their ideas?

Graham
Honestly, I don't have much of an opinion in the lawsuit. I have absolutely no problem with android phones.

But I will say, innovate <> blatantly copy either. Which I believe is the gist of what samsung was found guilty of doing.

In terms of the Itunes store, Apple did what no one else was doing in terms of making legally purchased music available and putting a well thought out interface around it. Similar to the original napster only in you can search for music you like and dowload it.

I honestly can't believe we have people talking about how android based phones have been innovative over the past year or 2, but then have people claiming the iphone itself was not innovative when it first launched. Come on.
foghat is offline