View Single Post
Old 07-25-2008, 09:47 PM   #34
nekokami
fruminous edugeek
nekokami ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.nekokami ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.nekokami ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.nekokami ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.nekokami ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.nekokami ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.nekokami ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.nekokami ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.nekokami ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.nekokami ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.nekokami ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.
 
nekokami's Avatar
 
Posts: 6,745
Karma: 551260
Join Date: Oct 2006
Location: Northeast US
Device: iPad, eBw 1150
Well, if you want to group the data by participants, it would be heteroscedastic, I suppose, but I don't know how meaningful that would be given his experimental design. Such as it is. The point being that you can only generate a mean by grouping by participants, but that wasn't the point of his study, and he shouldn't be trying to generate any kind of mean from what are, simply, categorical data.
nekokami is offline   Reply With Quote