View Single Post
Old 09-10-2012, 12:38 PM   #44
Dave_S
What Title ?
Dave_S ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.Dave_S ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.Dave_S ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.Dave_S ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.Dave_S ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.Dave_S ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.Dave_S ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.Dave_S ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.Dave_S ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.Dave_S ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.Dave_S ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.
 
Posts: 1,325
Karma: 1856232
Join Date: Jan 2009
Location: Bavaria Germany
Device: Sony Experia Z Ultra
Quote:
Originally Posted by HarryT View Post
But to claim, as the original article does, that the difference between the manufacturing cost of the iPhone and its selling price is all "profit" is just... silly.
Of course, you are correct that to call the figure that was given the actual "profit" is at least an exaggeration and maybe a little silly. However, that number is not diluted by very much, because all of the ancillary costs are spread over huge numbers of phones, only exceeded by Samsung's phone output. Since Samsung's phones are of a generally higher quality and much higher performance, while being sold at a lower unit cost, would seem to indicate that Apple's realized profits border on the obscene.
Dave_S is offline