Thread: 3g vs 4g
View Single Post
Old 09-08-2012, 10:10 PM   #18
Andrew H.
Grand Master of Flowers
Andrew H. ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.Andrew H. ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.Andrew H. ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.Andrew H. ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.Andrew H. ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.Andrew H. ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.Andrew H. ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.Andrew H. ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.Andrew H. ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.Andrew H. ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.Andrew H. ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.
 
Posts: 2,201
Karma: 8389072
Join Date: Oct 2010
Location: Naptown
Device: Kindle PW, Kindle 3 (aka Keyboard), iPhone, iPad 3 (not for reading)
Quote:
Originally Posted by afv011 View Post
There's a lot of confusion with 4G because the name has been misused by carriers to sell their 3.5G packages (also known as HSDPA+). The max you can get on HSDPA+ is, theoretically, 84Mb/s, but current implementations top out at 42Mb/s.

4G should be used exclusively for LTE, which is the new standard and provides increased speeds over 3G. You can get speeds in excess of 100Mb/s on LTE, again, theoretically.
Neither HSDPA+ nor LTE would have qualified as 4G under the original definition, which required 100 mb/s while moving, and 1gb/s while stationary.

The 4G definition was redefined in 2010 to include both HSDPA+ and LTE (even though LTE is much faster). I don't think it makes much sense to include them both in the definition, but they both meet it.

In the real world, good HSDPA+ speeds are around 10 mb/s and good LTE speeds are around 40 mb/s.
Andrew H. is offline   Reply With Quote