View Single Post
Old 08-31-2012, 01:10 AM   #23
=X=
Wizard
=X= ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.=X= ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.=X= ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.=X= ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.=X= ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.=X= ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.=X= ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.=X= ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.=X= ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.=X= ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.=X= ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.
 
=X='s Avatar
 
Posts: 3,671
Karma: 12205348
Join Date: Mar 2008
Device: Galaxy S, Nook w/CM7
Quote:
Originally Posted by Top100EbooksRank View Post
XBOX and PS3 have been sold "below" cost for years.

Microsoft lost some $168 per XBOX sold. Higher for Sony.
Your quoting me without the context it was written in. My statement was about how a vendor can take a loss on HW so long as they make revenue on the software/content they sell. However your quote only furthers my argument as there anybody else making XBOX compatible games consoles or PS3 compatible consoles. Not only does Xbox/PS3 not lease their platform, but no hardware vendor would touch the platform since they would have to enter the business losing money, with no sales from the SW/content to offset the loss.

=X=
=X= is offline   Reply With Quote