Quote:
Originally Posted by geekmaster
I understood that the first time I read it. Hawhill has used GPL in the past, which was my only concern. It is good that he has forsaken GPL in this particular instance, to simplify things.
|
In fact, it was merely kind of a renewal of a funny license joke I've played in another instance. It was meant to scare newbies enough to not let them try it unprepared for havoc - the software was only tested on my own device at that point. I'm open to license it under any license. As personal preferences go, I'm a fan of the MIT/BSD license family. However, I understand the reasons to use GPL, and I don't like arguing about them.
So: if needed, I'll happily relicense to what is requested. Just drop a note.