Quote:
Originally Posted by Mono
Janek,
there is the standard for pdf. What more would you wish than ISO standard?
Back to the fuel and car example. I didn't mean the case when you put different fuel than expected! I meant the case when you put fuel marked unleaded 95 in a car that requiers unleaded 95. Many things may happen. There might be, by error, completely different fuel - like petrol (nafta) labeled natural 95. It has happened to my friend. :-( Or there might be something similar to unleaded 95, but unintentionaly or intentionaly poluted (petrol, water, ....) or it simply does not meet the standards (engine works, but the consumption is higher or it lowers the life-span of the engine.) This all happens in real world, at least in my country - and I would be surprised, it wouldn't happen in your country (based on the salt-gate - for those who do not know - the "salt" meant for making the snow and ice to melt was repackaged and distributed as real salt for eating.... Large amount of "salt" had been converted into salt during several years, before it was discovered....). Is the producer of the car liable for all/any of those incoveniences? Of course not! It is the liability of the petrol distributor or petrol producer.
OK, I understand your frustration that M92 does not do the job for you. My only recomendation is to return it and buy something else. The problem is, there is no else, if you want 10" e-ink reader. 
PS.
If I decide to buy the 2nd one, I may buy it from you for full current price. So, you do not have to go to the court with very unsure result...  |
I think we exhausted the topic and going in circles now. Your analogy is wrong, because Onyx said the reader is capable of doing any pdf, and all other pdf readers take the file with no problems. So it is as if your (say) Porsche refused to run on fuel all VWs, Mercedes and Toyotas run on, despite Porsche announcing it will.
BTW Did I ever say I'm going to sue anyone? It'd be Booxtor in my case, and I have no intention of harming Booxtor :P