Quote:
Originally Posted by axel77
But why is it any more sensefull of the heirs getting money, while the ancestor is near-dead?
What about someone murdering an author because he wants his works to "be free" (and gets away with it, i.e. it cannot be determined who the murder was). Now suppose she is mother of a 6-year old. Then suddendly this kid will not only lose her mother, but also any financial backing she would have had, of the work her mother had already done, if only she would not have died?
Its so paradox, don't you see it?
|
And what if nobody bought the book?
We need a law to force everybody to buy books written by mothers...
And what about mothers who are ACTUALLY killed for a five dollars bill? How will eternal copyright protect them?
Come on!
In my country orphans do not starve! They are taken care of!
And the same care applies to the writer's orphan and to the farmer's one...
That's democracy.
I'm beginning to suppose that you think writers (or in general content producers) as an aristocracy who has more rights than anyone else.
Am I wrong?