Quote:
Originally Posted by Graham
The bit I find odd is that this jury ruled that Samsung's patents were valid, but that Apple didn't infringe them. Isn't the argument in the other jurisdictions to do with whether they were FRAND and what the fair licensing amount should be?
In other words, isn't it accepted by Apple elsewhere that they're using the technology?
Graham
|
The antitrust violation found by the jury seems to be saying that Samsung did not play by the rules when the standard was being defined and in their approach to licensing the tech. Usual legal caveats here, but it seems to me that that finding is going to haunt Samsung big time.