View Single Post
Old 08-25-2012, 10:33 AM   #296
Graham
Wizard
Graham ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.Graham ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.Graham ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.Graham ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.Graham ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.Graham ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.Graham ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.Graham ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.Graham ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.Graham ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.Graham ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.
 
Posts: 2,742
Karma: 32912427
Join Date: Feb 2008
Location: North Yorkshire, UK
Device: Kobo H20, Pixel 2, Samsung Chromebook Plus
The bit I find odd is that this jury ruled that Samsung's patents were valid, but that Apple didn't infringe them. Isn't the argument in the other jurisdictions to do with whether they were FRAND and what the fair licensing amount should be?

In other words, isn't it accepted by Apple elsewhere that they're using the technology?

Graham
Graham is offline   Reply With Quote