Thread: Apple v Samsung: Can Look and Feel Be Patented?
View Single Post
Old 08-24-2012, 08:20 PM   #238
murraypaul
Interested Bystander
murraypaul ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.murraypaul ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.murraypaul ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.murraypaul ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.murraypaul ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.murraypaul ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.murraypaul ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.murraypaul ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.murraypaul ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.murraypaul ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.murraypaul ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.
 
Posts: 3,726
Karma: 19728152
Join Date: Jun 2008
Device: Note 4, Kobo One
And for those obsessed by "rounded corners", Samsung was found not to have infringed D'889 for the Galaxy Tab 10.1. 889 being:
Quote:
“clean front, edge-to-edge glass, thin bezel, thin outer border, and rounded corners of a tablet”
murraypaul is offline   Reply With Quote