View Single Post
Old 07-21-2008, 02:45 PM   #13
tompe
Grand Sorcerer
tompe ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.tompe ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.tompe ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.tompe ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.tompe ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.tompe ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.tompe ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.tompe ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.tompe ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.tompe ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.tompe ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.
 
Posts: 7,452
Karma: 7185064
Join Date: Oct 2007
Location: Linköpng, Sweden
Device: Kindle Voyage, Nexus 5, Kindle PW
Quote:
Originally Posted by Alan View Post
When it comes to EU regulations, then the seller has to prove, that his sold item was not defective from the beginning if something breaks during the first six months after the customer bought it. From the seventh month to the 24th it up to the buyer to prove something was defective from the beginning. I'm no expert, but it is not so unlikely that some part(s) of the screen is (are) not as well manufactured and/or designed as it (they) should be.
Yes, the evidence rules are so. But demanding evidence from customers and hope they do not go to court is not respecting the rules. The 6 months I think was introduced because sellers tried to use customers lack of knowledge. I have noticed sellers trying to do this.
tompe is offline   Reply With Quote