View Single Post
Old 08-17-2012, 01:01 AM   #95
gmw
cacoethes scribendi
gmw ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.gmw ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.gmw ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.gmw ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.gmw ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.gmw ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.gmw ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.gmw ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.gmw ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.gmw ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.gmw ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.
 
gmw's Avatar
 
Posts: 5,818
Karma: 137770742
Join Date: Nov 2010
Location: Australia
Device: Kobo Aura One & H2Ov2, Sony PRS-650
Quote:
Originally Posted by djulian View Post
What evidence would suffice? Any study presented would have a counterstudy. [...]

The question centers, after all, on whether people who frequently consume erotic/pornographic content continue to think of sex the same way as people who don't. I believe they do not continue to think the same way--what they consume affects them, and that after viewing pornography on a regular basis, they think about sex differently than before. If I'm right, then those people would likely reject my claims--they don't think that their thoughts on sex have changed or been affected in any negative way. They're just fine with the effects.
The question of cause-and-effect also comes into it. Does reading certain material cause a person to behave a certain way, or do people that behave a certain way also have an affinity for particular content? How can you realistically separate cause-and-effect in these cases? Also, apropos this question and my previous post, it seems self-apparent that media often reflects societal mores rather than, necessarily, influencing them. There is a feedback loop going on here that makes the whole topic very murky.
gmw is offline   Reply With Quote