View Single Post
Old 08-14-2012, 10:21 AM   #22
avantman42
Wizard
avantman42 ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.avantman42 ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.avantman42 ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.avantman42 ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.avantman42 ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.avantman42 ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.avantman42 ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.avantman42 ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.avantman42 ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.avantman42 ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.avantman42 ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.
 
avantman42's Avatar
 
Posts: 1,090
Karma: 6058305
Join Date: Sep 2010
Location: UK
Device: Kindle Paperwhite
I agree that many proposed anti-piracy solutions are draconian (I once saw someone suggesting that Google should refuse to allow the word "torrent" in searches), but this doesn't seem too bad, and is certainly better than many.

Google tweak their search algorithms all the time, for various reasons. This is another tweak. They're not removing pages from search results based on DMCA notices, but they are using them as another data point in the algorithms. Also, note that they say:
Quote:
And we’ll continue to provide “counter-notice” tools so that those who believe their content has been wrongly removed can get it reinstated. We’ll also continue to be transparent about copyright removals.
I don't think this is particularly draconian.

Last edited by avantman42; 08-14-2012 at 10:22 AM. Reason: Hit post button by mistake :)
avantman42 is offline   Reply With Quote