View Single Post
Old 08-14-2012, 08:17 AM   #28
fjtorres
Grand Sorcerer
fjtorres ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.fjtorres ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.fjtorres ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.fjtorres ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.fjtorres ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.fjtorres ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.fjtorres ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.fjtorres ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.fjtorres ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.fjtorres ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.fjtorres ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.
 
Posts: 11,732
Karma: 128354696
Join Date: May 2009
Location: 26 kly from Sgr A*
Device: T100TA,PW2,PRS-T1,KT,FireHD 8.9,K2, PB360,BeBook One,Axim51v,TC1000
Quote:
Originally Posted by sabredog View Post
Does not matter if she was asked to voice her opinion or spoke about it regardless, the words were still spoken.
Correct. Plus, *she* was the one that brought self-publishing into the interview. She was asked a generic question; she gave a *specific* reply.

The interviewer herself addressed the issue in the comments I linked to at the Passive Voice. Here:
http://www.thepassivevoice.com/08/20...#comment-45488

Quote:
I did my due diligence on that particular question (the only follow-up I submitted to her past the original questionnaire). I stopped short of sending statistics to inform Ms. Grafton about how common it is to be an indie success, because I’ve found that puts interview subjects on the defensive, as a reporter.

I’m not writing for 60 Minutes here. This is a local topical news blog. It wasn’t my intention to alienate the interview subject or castigate her for being out of her depth. Believe me, had she been a serial killer or a political candidate, I’d have been much harder on her, but this wasn’t that kind of article–and no matter what, I’m biased by my full-time job as an indie author, so this was a tricky situation.

Her response was that the best-selling indies weren’t the ones she was talking about, which told me that the information embedded in the question didn’t even register. All she could relate to was the awful-selling self-published who go to the extreme of sending her copies of their horrible masterpieces.

Maybe not the most helpful or gracious answer, but fair enough. To Sue Grafton, indie authors = what’s sitting on her desk. It’s a disappointing answer, but it’s her reality, I suppose.

Regardless, it was Ms. Grafton who brought self-publishing into the conversation. Not I.
The fact that just because *some* self-published material may not be ready for prime time does not imply that *all* or even a majority of such material isn't. That kind of ignorant over-generalization is *lazy*, muddy thinking.

You might as well equate all traditionally-published material with the likes of this:
http://www.amazon.com/Shore-Thing-Ni.../dp/1451623747
(Currently sitting in the 475,000 range on Amazon, for Simon and Shuster fans out there.)

If she's going to judge people by what *others* do, she should be prepared to be similarly judged.

Last edited by fjtorres; 08-14-2012 at 08:19 AM.
fjtorres is offline   Reply With Quote