View Single Post
Old 08-13-2012, 02:13 PM   #16
Ninjalawyer
Guru
Ninjalawyer ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.Ninjalawyer ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.Ninjalawyer ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.Ninjalawyer ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.Ninjalawyer ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.Ninjalawyer ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.Ninjalawyer ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.Ninjalawyer ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.Ninjalawyer ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.Ninjalawyer ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.Ninjalawyer ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.
 
Ninjalawyer's Avatar
 
Posts: 826
Karma: 18573626
Join Date: Jun 2011
Location: Canada
Device: Kobo Touch, Nexus 7 (2013)
Quote:
Originally Posted by Mike L View Post
The key word is "valid". According to the article referenced above, "This new system will take into account every one of the Copyright Removal Requests they receive that turn out to be valid" (my italics).

This is presumably to prevent attempts to spam the system by issuing bogus notices to your competitors.

Mike
Indeed, that is a key word, but Google hasn't provided details yet on how they'll determine what is a valid takedown notice. Google is going to do this via algorithms rather than humans, so I'm curious what criteria they will use to determine validity.
Ninjalawyer is offline   Reply With Quote