Thread: Apple v Samsung: Can Look and Feel Be Patented?
View Single Post
Old 08-11-2012, 01:26 PM   #91
afv011
Captain Penguin
afv011 ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.afv011 ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.afv011 ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.afv011 ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.afv011 ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.afv011 ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.afv011 ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.afv011 ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.afv011 ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.afv011 ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.afv011 ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.
 
afv011's Avatar
 
Posts: 2,965
Karma: 2079999999
Join Date: May 2009
Location: Seattle, WA
Device: Kobo Clara BW, Kobo Libra 2, Nook Glowlight
Quote:
Originally Posted by fjtorres View Post
Another day, another doozy:
http://news.cnet.com/8301-13579_3-57491406-37/2010-apple-license-offer-to-samsung-$30-per-smartphone-$40-per-tablet/

Apple wanted $30 per smartphone and $40 per tablet from Samsung.

And people gripe about Microsoft licensing their function patent portfolio for $14 per device.

Clearly form is way more valuable than function.

Stay tuned.
I was pretty shocked when I saw the figures. That's outrageous. No wonder Sammy refused.
afv011 is offline   Reply With Quote