View Single Post
Old 08-10-2012, 04:12 PM   #55
fjtorres
Grand Sorcerer
fjtorres ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.fjtorres ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.fjtorres ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.fjtorres ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.fjtorres ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.fjtorres ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.fjtorres ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.fjtorres ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.fjtorres ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.fjtorres ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.fjtorres ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.
 
Posts: 11,732
Karma: 128354696
Join Date: May 2009
Location: 26 kly from Sgr A*
Device: T100TA,PW2,PRS-T1,KT,FireHD 8.9,K2, PB360,BeBook One,Axim51v,TC1000
Quote:
Originally Posted by wodin View Post
Wow! Only $115K (not counting the trip to Europe) for 576 pixels, le'see (figer figer); why that's only $200 per pixel. Cheap at twice the price!
Its a purely experimental treatment. For now.

The digital side isn't the issue--the tech is obviously well understood--the biology is what they're testing, to see how much bandwidth the optic nerve can *safely* accomodate.
(Remember the little bit about: "First, do no harm?")
So they start low, then gradually go higher.

That said, they don't need to go terribly high to make a big improvement in the quality of life of the patients. As little as a few thousand pixels would be worth the effort if they let the patient navigate the real world unaided or even read with aids.

Last edited by fjtorres; 08-10-2012 at 04:19 PM.
fjtorres is offline   Reply With Quote