View Single Post
Old 08-09-2012, 11:48 AM   #17
murraypaul
Interested Bystander
murraypaul ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.murraypaul ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.murraypaul ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.murraypaul ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.murraypaul ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.murraypaul ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.murraypaul ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.murraypaul ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.murraypaul ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.murraypaul ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.murraypaul ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.
 
Posts: 3,726
Karma: 19728152
Join Date: Jun 2008
Device: Note 4, Kobo One
Quote:
Originally Posted by HarryT View Post
One might regard is simply as notification that a site is hosting illegal content. I'd have thought that any reputable site would act on such notification, provided that the content really was illegal. There are of course a great many spurious take-down notices issued: MR gets them not infrequently (and MR is not a US company).
If enough information were provided for them to make a decision, they might do so. The fact that the information was provided in the form of a DMCA notice would be irrelevant, and is more likely to simply provoke a bounce-back, saying that the DMCA does not apply.
murraypaul is offline   Reply With Quote