Thread: Ebook Standards Collective
View Single Post
Old 08-07-2012, 10:08 PM   #27
VydorScope
Wizard
VydorScope ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.VydorScope ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.VydorScope ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.VydorScope ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.VydorScope ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.VydorScope ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.VydorScope ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.VydorScope ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.VydorScope ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.VydorScope ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.VydorScope ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.
 
VydorScope's Avatar
 
Posts: 3,418
Karma: 35207650
Join Date: Jun 2011
Device: iPad
Quote:
Originally Posted by anamardoll View Post
Yep. This is where my mind is, as well. I love the idea; the implementation concept gives me nightmares.

And that's not even getting into the fact that professional people with English degrees can and will vociferously disagree over what is and isn't "bare minimum" good grammar.

And then: a 100,000 word eBook has one error in it. (The Its/It's error.) Is it a "bad" eBook because it has ONE error? Most traditionally published books that I read have at least one error; sometimes more.

The details, I don't even. My head aches just imagining the arguments.
No to mention that "one error" might not be considered an error to all. The rules are no where near as hard and fast, nor as well accepted as people (esply here) think they are.
VydorScope is offline   Reply With Quote