View Single Post
Old 08-07-2012, 03:28 PM   #18
anamardoll
Chasing Butterflies
anamardoll ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.anamardoll ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.anamardoll ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.anamardoll ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.anamardoll ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.anamardoll ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.anamardoll ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.anamardoll ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.anamardoll ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.anamardoll ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.anamardoll ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.
 
anamardoll's Avatar
 
Posts: 3,132
Karma: 5074169
Join Date: Mar 2011
Location: American Southwest
Device: Uses batteries.
Quote:
Originally Posted by HarryT View Post
I was thinking more of cases where a standard could be used to reject books where the author clearly didn't have a clue, rather than disagreements about grammatical minutiae. Eg, look at posts on MR. I would estimate that at least a quarter of the posters here use "its" and "it's" incorrectly, and one might have thought that MR would attract the type of reader who had an above-average exposure to written material!
Well, that would be easy, but that wouldn't result in a shiny badge for everyone to put on their book, which is what I thought the OP was looking for.

Well, unless the shiny badge just meant "passes a bare minimum". But usually -- not always -- you can tell that from the sample, in my experience.
anamardoll is offline   Reply With Quote