View Single Post
Old 08-06-2012, 09:19 AM   #15
murraypaul
Interested Bystander
murraypaul ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.murraypaul ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.murraypaul ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.murraypaul ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.murraypaul ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.murraypaul ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.murraypaul ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.murraypaul ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.murraypaul ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.murraypaul ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.murraypaul ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.
 
Posts: 3,726
Karma: 19728152
Join Date: Jun 2008
Device: Note 4, Kobo One
Quote:
Originally Posted by SteveEisenberg View Post
Right. And if eInk charged a truly ridiculous price, other companies would ask to license the invention. And if the licensing terms demanded are excessive, the would-be competitor can sue. I
[...]
P.S. It could be that I am blowing smoke, concerning the licensing situation, in this post. If I misunderstand, I am willing to learn, especially if the told gently and the actually legal situation is given with appropriate links.
Well I can;t provide any links, but in general a company is under no obligation to license their patents. If they want to keep sole control of them, they can.
What you might be thinking of is the situation where a company has negotiated to make some of its patents required parts of a standard, and part of that agreement is that they must license them on a fair and non discriminatory basis to anyone who pays. That is part of the contract they made with the licensing body.
murraypaul is offline   Reply With Quote