View Single Post
Old 08-04-2012, 03:40 PM   #10
Belfaborac
Wizard
Belfaborac ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.Belfaborac ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.Belfaborac ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.Belfaborac ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.Belfaborac ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.Belfaborac ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.Belfaborac ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.Belfaborac ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.Belfaborac ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.Belfaborac ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.Belfaborac ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.
 
Belfaborac's Avatar
 
Posts: 1,498
Karma: 5199835
Join Date: May 2010
Location: Norway
Device: Sony PRS-505, PRS-950
I should have been more careful with how I phrased things I guess. This is basically what I was after:

Quote:
Originally Posted by tompe View Post
But see the question instead as: Is it better to trickle charge or better to use a proper charger that charge fast?
By "better" think "making the battery last longer before requiring charging again". Never mind cycle count and whatnot, I'm only thinking of whether a single charge can be made to last longer by trickle charging rather than blast charging.

Quote:
Originally Posted by HarryT View Post
It's the device which "decides" how much current to draw; the amperage rating of the charger merely designates how much current it's capable of supplying. I would imagine that the vast majority of devices would require more than 0.2A; a standard USB port can supply up to 500mA @5V.
While that's true as such, it certainly takes a lot less time to charge from a 1A USB wall charger than from a USB port on my PC. Hence it (the PRS-950) must be able to utilise more than 0.5A if more is available.
Belfaborac is offline   Reply With Quote