Quote:
Originally Posted by murraypaul
Um. the law tends to be a bit more complicated than that!
Each bit of evidence would be considered and ruled on.
In this case Samsung tried to introduce the evidence too late.
And I wouldn't be at all surprised if what Samsung have done here is considered contempt of court.
http://allthingsd.com/20120731/samsu...design-claims/
Edit: Samsung have already been sanctioned four times in this litigation, and are the subject of an adverse jury instruction. Apple are requesting a second such instruction as a result of this maneuvering. |
If you want to follow this case try reading
http://www.groklaw.net according to them Samsung had every right to release the evidence. And if the judge sanction them over it Samsung could get a mistrial.
Its funny many of Samsung innovations have become standards and Apple is not willing to pay for these patents but it sues for design patents. Apple could not have made Iphone or Ipad without using unlicensed Samsung technology.