Thread: Apple v Samsung: Can Look and Feel Be Patented?
View Single Post
Old 08-02-2012, 07:47 PM   #19
fjtorres
Grand Sorcerer
fjtorres ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.fjtorres ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.fjtorres ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.fjtorres ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.fjtorres ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.fjtorres ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.fjtorres ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.fjtorres ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.fjtorres ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.fjtorres ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.fjtorres ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.
 
Posts: 11,732
Karma: 128354696
Join Date: May 2009
Location: 26 kly from Sgr A*
Device: T100TA,PW2,PRS-T1,KT,FireHD 8.9,K2, PB360,BeBook One,Axim51v,TC1000
Quote:
Originally Posted by ScotiaBurrell View Post
Thats the patents.


But tradedress is all included togather...not two but one.
Nope.
Apple fought and won a trade dress suit without patents in the fruity iMac era. Just on "confusion".
http://www.sfgate.com/business/artic...ke-2922102.php
The patents are an *escalation* on plain trade dress claims which are based on a separate legal foundation.
Last edited by fjtorres; 08-02-2012 at 07:54 PM.
fjtorres is offline   Reply With Quote