Quote:
Originally Posted by murraypaul
Samsung don't seem to be off to a very good start with this Judge, as after she refused to admit some of Samsung's evidence, they leaked it to the media, and apparently admit that they did so in order that the jury could see it, even after the judge ruled against it, having released this statement:
http://www.slashgear.com/samsung-fin...ence-01241304/ |
IANAL, but from my point of view, it seems biased that the judge allows Apple to offer evidence that Samsung copied Apple, and then Samsung is not allowed a rebuttal. What is most puzzling is that Apple showed in their slides the Sammy F700 as an infringing device (even though it was designed before the iPhone came out), and Samsung is then not allowed to rebut this. How is this a fair trial?