Thread: Apple v Samsung: Can Look and Feel Be Patented?
View Single Post
Old 08-02-2012, 02:06 PM   #8
tubemonkey
monkey on the fringe
tubemonkey ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.tubemonkey ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.tubemonkey ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.tubemonkey ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.tubemonkey ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.tubemonkey ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.tubemonkey ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.tubemonkey ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.tubemonkey ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.tubemonkey ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.tubemonkey ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.
 
tubemonkey's Avatar
 
Posts: 45,770
Karma: 158733736
Join Date: May 2010
Location: Seattle Metro
Device: Moto E6, Echo Show
Quote:
Originally Posted by frahse View Post
I don't understand why Apple hasn't patented or copyrighted "blogging" and "surfing." Surely it is obvious that those things also tend to be "magical" and therefore belong to Apple.
Just let 'em try. They'll have a fight on their hands.

Spoiler:
tubemonkey is offline   Reply With Quote