Thread: Apple v Samsung: Can Look and Feel Be Patented?
View Single Post
Old 08-02-2012, 02:01 PM   #7
VaporPunk
Evangelist
VaporPunk ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.VaporPunk ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.VaporPunk ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.VaporPunk ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.VaporPunk ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.VaporPunk ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.VaporPunk ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.VaporPunk ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.VaporPunk ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.VaporPunk ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.VaporPunk ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.
 
VaporPunk's Avatar
 
Posts: 409
Karma: 49204386
Join Date: Mar 2012
Location: Belgium
Device: Kindle 4 + Asus Transformer
Quote:
Originally Posted by frahse View Post
I don't understand why Apple hasn't patented or copyrighted "blogging" and "surfing." Surely it is obvious that those things also tend to be "magical" and therefore belong to Apple.
Don't tell them about the Harry Potter series, or they're gonna sue J.K Rowling.
VaporPunk is offline   Reply With Quote