View Single Post
Old 07-18-2008, 05:20 PM   #117
rlauzon
Wizard
rlauzon put the bomp in the bomp-a-bomp-a-bomp.rlauzon put the bomp in the bomp-a-bomp-a-bomp.rlauzon put the bomp in the bomp-a-bomp-a-bomp.rlauzon put the bomp in the bomp-a-bomp-a-bomp.rlauzon put the bomp in the bomp-a-bomp-a-bomp.rlauzon put the bomp in the bomp-a-bomp-a-bomp.rlauzon put the bomp in the bomp-a-bomp-a-bomp.rlauzon put the bomp in the bomp-a-bomp-a-bomp.rlauzon put the bomp in the bomp-a-bomp-a-bomp.rlauzon put the bomp in the bomp-a-bomp-a-bomp.rlauzon put the bomp in the bomp-a-bomp-a-bomp.
 
rlauzon's Avatar
 
Posts: 1,018
Karma: 67827
Join Date: Jan 2005
Device: PocketBook Era
Quote:
Originally Posted by axel77 View Post
So don't say I'm not aware of this.
OK. I won't say it.

Quote:
Originally Posted by axel77 View Post
No, physical objects don't have anymore any "property" inscribed into them, than an ideas.
Take a toy away from a child and you'll see that property rights are pretty basic and far from being the social constructs that you make them out to be.

While current property laws may be "social ideas". The concept of ownership is a basic part of being human. Heck, many animals understand the concept (try to take a bone from a dog and see what I mean).
rlauzon is offline   Reply With Quote