View Single Post
Old 07-18-2008, 03:43 PM   #109
DMcCunney
New York Editor
DMcCunney ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.DMcCunney ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.DMcCunney ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.DMcCunney ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.DMcCunney ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.DMcCunney ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.DMcCunney ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.DMcCunney ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.DMcCunney ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.DMcCunney ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.DMcCunney ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.
 
DMcCunney's Avatar
 
Posts: 6,384
Karma: 16540415
Join Date: Aug 2007
Device: PalmTX, Pocket eDGe, Alcatel Fierce 4, RCA Viking Pro 10, Nexus 7
Quote:
Originally Posted by Ralph Sir Edward View Post
And the issue at hand is when should that copyright lapse....
Precisely.

Quote:
While it exists, it can be treated as property, ever though technically it's not.
Yes, and while you can debate whether it is technically property, it can be treated as such while it exists, which is why I refer to it as property. As mentioned, property implies ownership and control, and copyright grants both to the rights holder for the duration of the copyright.

Quote:
But how long should it exist? Remember, this monopoly was granted for the public's long term benefit, not to provide a social welfare policy for creators and their families. (Or to immortal corporations...)
I'm in favor of a shorter rather than a longer term. I'd like Life+25 years. I can live with Life+50 years. I'm opposed to greater lengths.

The greater lengths being pushed for largely are for the benefit of "immortal corporations", and wind up affecting individuals as a side effect.
______
Dennis
DMcCunney is offline   Reply With Quote