View Single Post
Old 08-01-2012, 12:11 PM   #10
Graham
Wizard
Graham ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.Graham ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.Graham ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.Graham ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.Graham ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.Graham ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.Graham ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.Graham ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.Graham ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.Graham ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.Graham ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.
 
Posts: 2,742
Karma: 32912427
Join Date: Feb 2008
Location: North Yorkshire, UK
Device: Kobo H20, Pixel 2, Samsung Chromebook Plus
Quote:
Originally Posted by joehunt View Post
Yes, of course. Just like the current pricing model led to lower prices and less choice during the past two years.
I loved that graph they included in their comments to the DoJ, which they claimed showed a downward trend for ebook prices, as a success for the Agency model.

The DoJ responded (see p30) with the same graph but with a label pointing out that the graph included nearly a year's prior data and that the downward trend ended neatly at the point where the Agency agreements were put in place, and after that the graph stabilises. In the DoJ's words:

Quote:
However, as the CFA observed, even with these uncertainties, B&N’s own data suggests that the collusive agreement played a role in stabilizing retail e-book prices. As the CFA points out, just as the collusive agency agreements were taking effect in the spring of 2010, a trend of falling e-book pricing was arrested.
Graham
Graham is offline   Reply With Quote