View Single Post
Old 08-01-2012, 11:26 AM   #3
heySkippy
Groupie
heySkippy ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.heySkippy ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.heySkippy ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.heySkippy ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.heySkippy ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.heySkippy ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.heySkippy ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.heySkippy ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.heySkippy ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.heySkippy ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.heySkippy ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.
 
Posts: 182
Karma: 1316076
Join Date: Jan 2012
Location: Florida
Device: iPad
I thought the case was about both patents and trade dress.

IMO Apple has a very strong case on the trade dress part. The patents, perhaps not so much.
heySkippy is offline   Reply With Quote