View Single Post
Old 07-31-2012, 10:03 AM   #1
andrewburt
Science Fiction Writer
andrewburt can talk all four legs off a donkey... then persuade it to go for a walk.andrewburt can talk all four legs off a donkey... then persuade it to go for a walk.andrewburt can talk all four legs off a donkey... then persuade it to go for a walk.andrewburt can talk all four legs off a donkey... then persuade it to go for a walk.andrewburt can talk all four legs off a donkey... then persuade it to go for a walk.andrewburt can talk all four legs off a donkey... then persuade it to go for a walk.andrewburt can talk all four legs off a donkey... then persuade it to go for a walk.andrewburt can talk all four legs off a donkey... then persuade it to go for a walk.andrewburt can talk all four legs off a donkey... then persuade it to go for a walk.andrewburt can talk all four legs off a donkey... then persuade it to go for a walk.andrewburt can talk all four legs off a donkey... then persuade it to go for a walk.
 
andrewburt's Avatar
 
Posts: 231
Karma: 124188
Join Date: Dec 2010
Location: Golden, CO
Device: several
Which do you prefer with trilogies?

So, which do you prefer for trilogies, three separate books or all in one?

We're publishing a very long three-part science fiction book; it's 250,000 words long (compared to your common SF novel at about 80-100,000 words). It naturally falls into three books, based on time, but the main characters progress through all three and it's one unified, epic story. We're releasing it both in ebook form and in print.

Which excites you more as a reader, reading something like that all at once? Or do you enjoy it more when it's in three books, with three covers, getting excited to wait for the continuation and conclusion? (And if so, how long between releases?)
andrewburt is offline   Reply With Quote