View Single Post
Old 07-17-2008, 06:55 PM   #96
axel77
Fanatic
axel77 has learned how to read e-booksaxel77 has learned how to read e-booksaxel77 has learned how to read e-booksaxel77 has learned how to read e-booksaxel77 has learned how to read e-booksaxel77 has learned how to read e-booksaxel77 has learned how to read e-booksaxel77 has learned how to read e-books
 
Posts: 584
Karma: 914
Join Date: Mar 2008
Device: iliad
Quote:
Originally Posted by axel77 View Post
I agree, even with "real property" its no "inherent right", but property a usefull idea which allowed human settlements to work. That those who cared of field and cattle are those who are entitled to "harvest" them... otherwise nobody would be encouraged to care for them until harvesting season. If its one thing anthropology showed us, is that "close-nature" societies often don't even know of the concept of property, especially if it are hunting societies not doing field work.
Yes I quoted myself to rebring this into the discussion. Even for physical things, there is nothing on them that makes them "property" to yours, but only social rules of other thinking its your property and working that way. Inventing "property" just made things work, that didn't do well wihout. Why should copyright be so different, as to treat it as a social invention.

I agree however that copyright is no "natural" right given to anybody.
axel77 is offline   Reply With Quote