View Single Post
Old 07-27-2012, 03:30 PM   #12
RainingLemur
Spork Connoisseur
RainingLemur ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.RainingLemur ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.RainingLemur ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.RainingLemur ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.RainingLemur ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.RainingLemur ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.RainingLemur ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.RainingLemur ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.RainingLemur ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.RainingLemur ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.RainingLemur ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.
 
RainingLemur's Avatar
 
Posts: 2,355
Karma: 16780603
Join Date: Mar 2011
Device: Nook Color
Quote:
Originally Posted by Andrew H. View Post
It's admissible for impeachment, though - meaning that if Apple said something that was contradicted by something Jobs told Isaacson, that would be admissible to impeach that statement.

Isaacson's notes may also be admissible under the business records exception, although I'm not certain.
I'm pretty much a dunce when it comes to this stuff.... But, what good would impeaching statements do?
RainingLemur is offline   Reply With Quote