View Single Post
Old 07-24-2012, 02:46 PM   #47
stonetools
Wizard
stonetools ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.stonetools ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.stonetools ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.stonetools ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.stonetools ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.stonetools ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.stonetools ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.stonetools ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.stonetools ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.stonetools ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.stonetools ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.
 
stonetools's Avatar
 
Posts: 2,016
Karma: 2838487
Join Date: Oct 2010
Location: Washington, DC
Device: Ipad, IPhone
Quote:
Originally Posted by Graham View Post
This is the bit I don't understand. They're worried that it will hurt the consumers if Amazon eventually decides to raise the prices... like they did?

Graham
They do raise that as an argument, and its plausible-monopolies do raise prices (MS Office could be a lot cheaper ). However, the price argument is not their Sunday punch.

Their real argument is that the book industry will become poorer and less productive. B&M stores will more rapidly go out of business, meaning that discovery options for authors will decline . Publishers will be subject to be squeezed by a monopsonistic retailer (Amazon) and and will therefore lack the resources to finance major nonfiction projects like Robert Caro's multi-volume biography of LBJ and to bet on ground breaking new authors .

They also argue that the remedy provided will be an administrative nightmare . They make quite a few arguments, some better than others.

If your focus is purely on prices short term, then those arguments will be unconvincing.
stonetools is offline   Reply With Quote