Quote:
Originally Posted by Toxaris
Probably some autocorrection going on.
|
Yep. It was definitely the built-in, well-formed code check of Sigil's. It's usually quite vocal about most issues when it's turned on; so its silent corrections threw me for a bit of a loop.
Anyway... glad it's sorted. I assumed from the beginning (as did everyone else, of course) it was invalid xhtml, but couldn't understand why it kept passing numerous validation engines in spite of my assumptions.