MobileRead Forums - View Single Post

DiapDealer · 07-17-2012, 11:59 AM

I'm not sure I understand the question. You haven't made your look-behind or look-ahead assertions optional, so both should already be required. Your expression should already be logically correct. But I'm not certain whether you're looking for instances where the bullet IS or ISN'T enclosed with p tags.

IS

Code:

(?<=<p class="calibre1">)•(?=</p>)

ISN'T

Code:

(?<!<p class="calibre1">)•(?!</p>)

07-17-2012, 11:59 AM	#2
DiapDealer Grand Sorcerer Posts: 28,682 Karma: 205039118 Join Date: Jan 2010 Device: Nexus 7, Kindle Fire HD	I'm not sure I understand the question. You haven't made your look-behind or look-ahead assertions optional, so both should already be required. Your expression should already be logically correct. But I'm not certain whether you're looking for instances where the bullet IS or ISN'T enclosed with p tags. IS Code: (?<=<p class="calibre1">)•(?=</p>) ISN'T Code: (?<!<p class="calibre1">)•(?!</p>)