View Single Post
Old 07-16-2012, 12:56 PM   #6
JoeD
Guru
JoeD ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.JoeD ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.JoeD ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.JoeD ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.JoeD ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.JoeD ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.JoeD ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.JoeD ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.JoeD ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.JoeD ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.JoeD ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.
 
Posts: 895
Karma: 4383958
Join Date: Nov 2007
Device: na
Quote:
Originally Posted by afv011 View Post
P2P clients have an encryption feature that prevents listening parties from determining the content. Also, there may be legalities about deep packet inspection to determine what the payload is. But, would anybody be surprised if it turned out the vast majority of P2P traffic was for the distribution of pirated content?
Yeah, I'm aware of the encryption and potential legal issues.

I wouldn't be surprised if the majority is infringing either, it just seems dodgy to draw conclusions regarding piracy from traffic data where there's no way to tell how much is legit and how much is infringing, unless the majority of legit p2p services are not encrypting their data and you know of those that do, they tend to carry infringing material more than legit
JoeD is offline   Reply With Quote