View Single Post
Old 07-14-2012, 01:42 PM   #123
BearMountainBooks
Maria Schneider
BearMountainBooks ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.BearMountainBooks ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.BearMountainBooks ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.BearMountainBooks ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.BearMountainBooks ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.BearMountainBooks ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.BearMountainBooks ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.BearMountainBooks ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.BearMountainBooks ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.BearMountainBooks ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.BearMountainBooks ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.
 
BearMountainBooks's Avatar
 
Posts: 3,746
Karma: 26439330
Join Date: Aug 2009
Location: Near Austin, Texas
Device: 3g Kindle Keyboard
By the way, in reference to innovation still occurring and being quite healthy under older copyright rules or in cases where copyright/patents didn't exist at all--it should be noted that back in earlier days, it was much, much more difficult to "copy" or redistribute goods. It took a lot more work to take a book (in or out of copyright) and reproduce it. The lack if technology made theft or redistribution unlikely. So innovation and money-making could occur without as much threat as exists today.

The same holds true with patents on technology or drugs. The knowledge to recreate a drug was difficult to come by. The ability to copy car technology was not easy to come by. The sheer lack of being able to share intelligence protected innovators for a time. These days, not so much.
BearMountainBooks is offline   Reply With Quote