View Single Post
Old 07-13-2012, 04:01 PM   #86
DarkScribe
Apprentice Curmudgeon.
DarkScribe ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.DarkScribe ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.DarkScribe ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.DarkScribe ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.DarkScribe ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.DarkScribe ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.DarkScribe ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.DarkScribe ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.DarkScribe ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.DarkScribe ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.DarkScribe ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.
 
DarkScribe's Avatar
 
Posts: 427
Karma: 3286968
Join Date: Apr 2011
Location: Runaway Bay, QLD, , Australia
Device: Kindle DX Graphite, Touch, Paperwhite, Sony, and Nook.
"We the people"?

How about "We, a very small and insignificant group of greedy people"? It would seem more apt.

I see no reason for a reduction in copyright duration. The claim that copyright hinders science or prevents any form of library is disingenuous. It appears to be a facile attempt to get something for nothing. The petition was started by someone who is not prepared to give his full name, nor provide one good reason for reducing the term of copyright.

BTW, what is a "useful art" and who defines it?
DarkScribe is offline   Reply With Quote