View Single Post
Old 07-13-2012, 02:03 PM   #68
ApK
Award-Winning Participant
ApK ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.ApK ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.ApK ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.ApK ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.ApK ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.ApK ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.ApK ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.ApK ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.ApK ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.ApK ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.ApK ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.
 
Posts: 7,390
Karma: 68329346
Join Date: Feb 2010
Location: NJ, USA
Device: Kindle
Quote:
Originally Posted by QuantumIguana View Post
Wikipedia is not "pleading" for money.
Umm...it's really not a matter for debate. Here's some Google hits....

Wikipedia Pleas for Money, Should we give Wikipedia Money ...
What's Up With The Wikipedia Plea for Donations? – ...
Wikipedia's Increasingly Angry Pleas for Cash ...
Wikipedia Makes Another Plea for Donations ...
How Effective Is Jimmy Wales' Creepy Plea for Wikipedia Money ...
Wikipedia's new plea for donations stirs skepticism ...

Anyway....
Encarta folded but Britannica Online did not. It hardly serves as a comparison or statement regarding of any kind of copyright licensing models.

And Wikipedia does not make profit, that's not it's goal, so I do not see the relevance of that comparison in this context.
ApK is offline   Reply With Quote