View Single Post
Old 07-13-2012, 08:26 AM   #18
Kumabjorn
Basculocolpic
Kumabjorn ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.Kumabjorn ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.Kumabjorn ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.Kumabjorn ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.Kumabjorn ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.Kumabjorn ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.Kumabjorn ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.Kumabjorn ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.Kumabjorn ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.Kumabjorn ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.Kumabjorn ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.
 
Kumabjorn's Avatar
 
Posts: 4,356
Karma: 20181319
Join Date: Jul 2010
Location: Sweden
Device: Kindle 3 WiFi, Kindle 4SO, Kindle for Android, Sony PRS-350 and PRS-T1
Quote:
Originally Posted by pdurrant View Post
I've been looking at the current text of the Berne Convention.

I'm not sure whether you're right or not. I thought it would be clear, but the more I read it the more puzzled I get.

Can anyone quote article and clause to justify either position?
International conventions and treatsies are known as "negotiable" texts, ie if not explicitly prohibited then it is allowed. Most laws, outside civil law, are known as "non-negotaible" texts, hence if not explicitly allowed (usually as an exception in a specific clause) then it is prohibited.
Kumabjorn is offline   Reply With Quote