View Single Post
Old 07-12-2012, 03:07 AM   #447
ilovejedd
hopeless n00b
ilovejedd ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.ilovejedd ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.ilovejedd ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.ilovejedd ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.ilovejedd ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.ilovejedd ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.ilovejedd ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.ilovejedd ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.ilovejedd ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.ilovejedd ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.ilovejedd ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.
 
ilovejedd's Avatar
 
Posts: 5,110
Karma: 19597086
Join Date: Jan 2009
Location: in the middle of nowhere
Device: PW4, PW3, Libra H2O, iPad 10.5, iPad 11, iPad 12.9
Quote:
Originally Posted by SeaKing View Post
You are correct, but I am waiting for Samsung to spin off a Note Touch like Apple spins off a iPod Touch which is essentially the same as the iPhone without the cellular hardware, without the auto-focus, with a slightly different screen for about $300 cheaper.

A Notre 5.3" for less than $300 would be very tempting. Very, very!

A Galaxy Player 5.0" with a 1000 to 1200 pixel screen would be fabulous. It should cost (looking at less than $200 for the Player now) about $225 or so.
I probably would pay another $25 for a AMOLED screen.
Probably wouldn't have a digitizer, either, among other things. I reckon something in the price range you want would be closer to a Galaxy Player with 1280x720 display than it would be to the Note. By the way, the auto-focuus camera is actually quite useful in some apps (e.g. scanning QR codes, bar codes for price check, etc).

I actually dislike AMOLED. Colors are just too vibrant that they don't look natural anymore.
ilovejedd is offline   Reply With Quote