View Single Post
Old 07-09-2012, 10:22 PM   #66
valar84
Member
valar84 ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.valar84 ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.valar84 ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.valar84 ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.valar84 ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.valar84 ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.valar84 ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.valar84 ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.valar84 ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.valar84 ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.valar84 ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.
 
Posts: 15
Karma: 325672
Join Date: Feb 2012
Device: Kobo Vox + Wifi
Quote:
Originally Posted by tubemonkey View Post
Still, it's thicker than the touch. When the touch 4 was released and people complained about the 0.7MP cam, various tech sites said the iPhone's cam was too thick to fit in the touch's very thin case. So, have they improved cam tech since then to allow a real cam into the touch?
The Droid RAZR is slightly thinner than the iPod Touch and it packs a 8 MP camera. It's not a matter of camera technology, it's probably a matter of cost. They sell the iPod Touch starting at 199$, and Apple isn't in the habit of making loss-leaders, whereas the iPhone 4S starts at 650$ (you pay less only because the provider pays 450$ in subsidy to Apple). They can afford to put better components in the iPhone than in the iPod Touch.
valar84 is offline   Reply With Quote