View Single Post
Old 07-09-2012, 11:57 AM   #1
Top100EbooksRank
Banned
Top100EbooksRank ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.Top100EbooksRank ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.Top100EbooksRank ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.Top100EbooksRank ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.Top100EbooksRank ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.Top100EbooksRank ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.Top100EbooksRank ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.Top100EbooksRank ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.Top100EbooksRank ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.Top100EbooksRank ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.Top100EbooksRank ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.
 
Posts: 304
Karma: 6102528
Join Date: Mar 2012
Device: Kindle
UK High Court: Samsung tablets 'not as cool' as iPad, so they don't infringe



Quote:
Samsung won a victory over Apple in the UK high court as part of its world-spanning battle over intellectual property and design after a judge ruled the design of its Galaxy Tab isn't cool enough to be confused with an iPad.

The ruling, by Judge Colin Birss, means that Apple cannot stop the import or sale of the Galaxy Tab 10 under claims it has made that the designs are too close to those of the iPad.

Instead, Judge Birss ruled that Samsung's designs did not have the same understated and extreme simplicity which is possessed by the Apple design: "They are not as cool."

He noted distinctions such as the thickness and details on the backs of the devices in his ruling. "The informed user's overall impression of each of the Samsung Galaxy Tablets is the following," he said in his ruling. "From the front they belong to the family which includes the Apple design; but the Samsung products are very thin, almost insubstantial members of that family with unusual details on the back. They do not have the same understated and extreme simplicity which is possessed by the Apple design. They are not as cool. The overall impression produced is different."
http://www.washingtonpost.com/busine...MYW_story.html

Quote:
The judge in the case, the report said, justified his assertion by pointing to the thickness of the tablets and the way they look and feel in the back. The Samsung tablets he said, “do not have the same understated and extreme simplicity which is possessed by the Apple design,” Bloomberg reported.

Even with that ding, Samsung was happy with the ruling, saying that it proves Apple doesn’t have the sole right to “generic” product design.

“Should Apple continue to make excessive legal claims in other countries based on such generic designs, innovation in the industry could be harmed and consumer choice unduly limited,” the Korean company told Bloomberg in an e-mail. Apple has said in the past that Samsung’s designs “blatantly” copy its own and that it simply wants other companies to make their own, original products.

I wonder why laptop companies didn't sue each others over the generic design of laptop.

Or Television for that matter. A lot of LCD/LED television have basically the same shape and what not.

Last edited by Top100EbooksRank; 07-09-2012 at 12:00 PM.
Top100EbooksRank is offline   Reply With Quote