View Single Post
Old 07-13-2008, 12:27 PM   #112
delphidb96
Wizard
delphidb96 ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.delphidb96 ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.delphidb96 ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.delphidb96 ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.delphidb96 ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.delphidb96 ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.delphidb96 ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.delphidb96 ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.delphidb96 ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.delphidb96 ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.delphidb96 ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.
 
Posts: 2,999
Karma: 300001
Join Date: Jan 2007
Location: Citrus Heights, California
Device: TWO Kindle 2s, one each Bookeen Cybook Gen3, Sony PRS-500, Axim X51V
Quote:
Originally Posted by nekokami View Post
I'm not sure you can publish a picture of a private residence without obtaining a release from the owner. (I wouldn't try it.) And I could see that varying from one jurisdiction to another.

Regarding the legal situation wrt HarryT's avatar, that wasn't settled (even though HarryT and the copyright holders of the character, model, and photograph respectively were all in the same legal jurisdiction). We didn't even get consensus on the moral question. The closest we came was agreeing that the copyright holder of the Dalek image was unlikely to come after HarryT for the usage.
If you can make the image without trespassing on the homeowner's property, you have the right to take the image - and use it for "editorial" or "artistic" purposes. Using it for "advertising" purposes requires the homeowner's permission.

Derek
delphidb96 is offline   Reply With Quote