View Single Post
Old 07-06-2012, 05:16 AM   #9
carpetmojo
Wizard
carpetmojo ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.carpetmojo ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.carpetmojo ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.carpetmojo ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.carpetmojo ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.carpetmojo ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.carpetmojo ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.carpetmojo ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.carpetmojo ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.carpetmojo ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.carpetmojo ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.
 
Posts: 3,117
Karma: 9269999
Join Date: Feb 2011
Location: UK
Device: Sony- T3, PRS650, 350, T1/2/3, Paperwhite, Fire 8.9,Samsung Tab S 10.5
Quote:
Originally Posted by Ankh View Post
I wonder, can it (ever) become a sufficiently bad PR move to hurt the interest of these companies?
First, which side do you mean, the patent holder, or the patent (so-called") infringer ? !
I reckon they take it in turns so as to even out the publicity value !

Secondly, while sensible patent rights exist, you will always get others trying to infringe/nick/rip-off/break.
Obviously, while some form of patent process has to exist in capitalistic democracies, some applications and those granted are plainly daft/dumb/stupid.

One obvious one is the claiming of rights over a word or abbreviation - the 'r' as in Toys R Us for example - which is truly pathetic.
Another recent one is the conviction of a company that it could claim patent rights to a shape - the famous rectangle with rounded corners.

A rather frightening one, to my mind , is the genome patenting that could have unforeseen consequences.....
carpetmojo is offline   Reply With Quote