View Single Post
Old 07-12-2008, 02:27 PM   #93
slayda
Retired & reading more!
slayda ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.slayda ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.slayda ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.slayda ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.slayda ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.slayda ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.slayda ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.slayda ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.slayda ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.slayda ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.slayda ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.
 
slayda's Avatar
 
Posts: 2,764
Karma: 1884247
Join Date: Sep 2006
Location: North Alabama, USA
Device: Kindle 1, iPad Air 2, iPhone 6S+, Kobo Aura One
Personal experience with patents

Some years ago I worked for a year for a chemical company. My entire work consisted of trying to find a formula that would be enough like a patented formula to achieve the same results but would be enough different to "not violate" their patent.

The question here is could the same be done with copyright & if so how different? E.g. the person who published a Harry Potter glossary did not in fact copy any of the original stories but was still accused of copyright violation.
slayda is offline   Reply With Quote