Quote:
Originally Posted by DiapDealer
That's because none of them are as thorough, persistent, and all-pervasive (never missing a single thread) on the subject. You are simply too interested and too white/black on matters. Take me for instance: I don't have one easily quantifiable "stance" on a lot of these subjects—except if you count the uncontrollable urge to occasionally interrupt the polemic of those who do espouse the sort of bi-partisan certainty that has everybody at each other's throats in this day and age. You're simply too "the publisher can do absolutely no wrong in my eyes" to be seen as a casual bystander. I don't meant that as an insult... simply an observation. I, myself, can see valid points from both the "status quo" and the "paradigm change" camps in this scary/exciting/interesting period in the industry. *shrugs*
|
As it happens, I am critical of publishers on a number of grounds. Maybe I should do a "What publishers are doing wrong" post. Generally, though, on this site, you pretty much have be 1500 per cent against the " BPHs" all day, every day so when you join a thread, its usually critical of publishers. If I am pro anything, I'm pro author. But if you don't see it that way, oh well...